Protected Bicycle Lanes Rule, Cars Drool - CMNS 165



Protected Bicycle Lanes Rule, Cars Drool - Patrick Newman - Feb. 28, 2018
Drivers beware because cyclists are out to conquer the road. Victoria continues to add protected cycling routes and it is something we should all get behind. The benefits are numerous. 
That cycling is good for your health may be obvious. Researchers at the University of BC have done extensive studies on cycling and health. According to their work, countries that cycle more are less obese. The UBC studies show moderate cycling can cut heart attack risk in half, reduce the risk of diabetes and heart disease, and improve mental health. Regardless of the direct health benefits, being unfit carries a large price tag for the tax payer. “The economic costs of physical inactivity and obesity in Canada in 2001 were estimated at $5.3 billion and $4.3 billion, respectively,” says the UBC Medical Journal. 
Studies on the economic impact of protected bike lanes within urban areas, “all reach a similar conclusion: replacing on-street parking with a bike lane has little to no impact on local business, and in some cases might even increase business.” 
In a given month, cyclists spend more at and make more stops at more businesses than drivers do with the exception of grocery stores. In New York, 95 percent of retail spending is by cyclists and pedestrians according to an article published by CityLab. Data from other cities point to businesses in Victoria near protected bike lanes seeing continued levels of traffic if not more.
The American Association of Retired Persons lists many reasons bike lanes benefit the entire community. In an article written for the AARP website, cycling is better for the environment and encourages more cycling. Bike lanes also make roads safer for drivers and cyclists by reducing any confusion over who has the right of way on a road or at intersections. They are far cheaper to construct than standard roads and they last longer as cycling doesn’t wear on the road nearly as much as vehicle traffic. They reduce noise pollution and contribute to an improved community aesthetic. The city of Copenhagen is proof that a cycling city is a beautiful, quieter city with the improved health of its citizens. 
Many local residents continue to complain about the bike lanes arguing that the money should be spent somewhere else. Some think their tax money should be better spent improving the vehicle commute from downtown Victoria to the Western Communities or increasing parking spaces. Perhaps these people may not be as grumpy about their tax dollars if they left their SUV’s at home, hopped on a bike and learned the joys of passing frustrated drivers waiting for their light to turn green.

Jaffe, E. (2015). The complete business case for converting street parking into bike lanes. CityLab. From online Feb. 26, 2018: https://www.citylab.com/solutions/2015/03/the-complete-business-case-for-converting-street-parking-into-bike-lanes/387595/

Teschke, K., Reynolds, C. C., Ries, F. J., Gouge, B., & Winters, M. (2012, March 3). Bicycling: Health risk or benefit? UBC Medical Journal Volume 3 Issue 2 (March 15, 2012) Retrieved February 27, 2018, from http://cyclingincities-spph.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2017/09/Teschke2012-Bicycling_HealthRiskorBenefit.pdf

Walljasper, J. (2016). How bicycling infrastructure benefits non bicyclists. AARP. From online Feb 26, 2018: https://www.aarp.org/livable-communities/getting-around/info-2016/why-bicycling-infrastructure-is-good-for-people-who-dont-ride-bikes.html

Comments